Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2018, 66(3), 665-668 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201866030665

Effect of Breed on Frequency of Morphological Defects in Boar Spermatozoa

Vendula Kamanová, Pavel Nevrkla, Zdeněk Hadaš
Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

The aim of this study was to assess an effect of breed on frequency of morphological changes in boar spermatozoa. A total of 1080 semen samples were used in this study. The samples were collected from January to December 2017 from 90 boars of the Duroc, Czech Large White and Czech Landrace breeds. Sperm cell abnormalities were evaluated microscopically from dyed smears of native semen on glass slides. Defects of spermatozoa were divided according to their impact on fertility of boars into categories of "major defects" (with a great negative effect on fertility) and "minor defects" (with a mild effect on fertility). The overall frequency of spermatozoa with morphological defects ranged from 11.62 % in Czech Landrace to 20.96 % in Duroc. Statistically significant differences were found in the frequencies of both major and minor defects among the breeds. The results of this study document that there are great inter-breed differences in the occurrence of morphologically defective spermatozoa that significantly affect fertility of boars.

Keywords: boar, breed, ejaculate, spermatozoa, morphological defect
Grants and funding:

This study was supported by the project of MENDELU internal grant agency, Faculty of AgriSciences No. TP 7/2017.

Published: June 28, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kamanová, V., Nevrkla, P., & Hadaš, Z. (2018). Effect of Breed on Frequency of Morphological Defects in Boar Spermatozoa. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis66(3), 665-668. doi: 10.11118/actaun201866030665
Download citation

References

  1. BLOM, E. 1972. The ultrastructure of some characteristic sperm defects and a proposal for a new classification of the bull spermiogram. In: Atti del VII Simposio Int di Zootechnia Milan, pp. 125-139.
  2. COLENBRANDER, B. and KEMP, B. 1990. Factors influencing semen quality in pigs. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl., 40: 105-115.
  3. CORCUERA, B., DE ALBA, C., HERNÁNDEZ - GIL, R. and SAGÜÉS, A. 2002. Identifying abnormalities in boar semen. Pig Progress, 18: 24-27.
  4. ČEŘOVSKÝ, J. 1976. Metoda barvení kančích spermií pro morfologické hodnocení. Živ. Výr., 21: 361-366.
  5. DE VOS, A., VAN DE VELDE, H., JORIS, H., VERHEYEN, G., DEVROEY, P. and VAN STEIRTEGHEM, A. 2003. Influence of individual sperm morfology on fertilization, embryo morfology, and pregnancy outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil. Steril., 79(1): 42-48. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04571-5 Go to original source...
  6. VÚVEL. 2015. DeSMA (Detailed Sperm Morphology Analysis). Software. Brno: Výzkumný ústav veterinárního lékařství, v. v. i.
  7. FEITSMA, H., BERGSMA, R. and LAAR, A. 2005. Effect of morphological abnormal sperm cells on farrowing rate and litter size in pigs In: Proceedings 7th International Conference on Pig Reproduction. Abstracts of pousters, 12 - 15 June, Rolduc, The Netherlands.
  8. GAMČÍK, P., KOZUMPLÍK, J., MESÁROŠ, P., SCHVARC, F., VLČEK, Z. and ZIBRÍN, M. 1992. Andrológia a umelá inseminácia hospodárskych zvierat. Bratislava: Nakladatelstvo Príroda.
  9. JELÍNEK, P. and KOUDELA, K. 2003. Fyziologie hospodářských zvířat. Brno: Mendelova zemědělská a lesnická univerzita.
  10. KING, G. J. and MACPHERSON, J. W. 1973. A comparison of two methods for boar semen collection. J. Anim. Sci., 36(3): 563-565. DOI: 10.2527/jas1973.363563x Go to original source...
  11. KLUPCZYNSKI, J., MICINSKI, J. and NOGALSKI, Z. 2000. Effect of age and evaluation season on quality of semen of the Limousine breed bull. Zeszyty Naukowe AR we Wroclawiu. Konferencje XXIV, 375: 237-245.
  12. KONDRAZCKI, S. and WYSOKINSKA, A. 2005. Charakterystyka zmian w budowie morfologicznej plemenikow knura, z uwzglednieniem wieku i rasy rozplodnika. Folia Univ. Agric. Stetin. Zootech., 243: 97-104.
  13. KRAJŇÁK, P. 1995 Vplyv morfologicky abnormálních spermií kancov na prasnosť inseminovaných prasníc. Živ. Výr., 40: 537-540.
  14. PINART, E., CAMPS, E., BRIZ, M. O., BONET, S. and EGOZCUE, J. 1998. Unilateral spontaneosus abdominal cryptochidism: structural and ultrastructural study of sperm morfology. Anim. Reprod. Sci, 49: 247-268. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4320(97)00074-2 Go to original source...
  15. STATSOFT. 2013. Statistica CZ, version 12.0. Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA: StatSoft, Inc.
  16. THUNDATHIL, J., PALASZ, A. T., BARTH, A. D. and MAPLETOFT, R. J. 2001. The use of in vitro fertilization techniques to investigate the fertilizing ability of bovine sperm with proximal cytoplasmic droplets. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 65: 181-192. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00231-1 Go to original source...
  17. VĚŽNÍK, Z., ŠVECOVÁ, D. ZAJÍCOVÁ, A., RUBEŠ, J., RYBÁŘ, R., MACHATKOVÁ, M., and HORÁKOVÁ, J. 2004. Repetitorium spermatologie a andrologie a metodiky spermatoanalýzy. Výzkumný ústav veterinárního lékařství.
  18. VOGLER, C. J., SAACKE, R. G., BAME, J. M., DEJARNETTE, J. M. and MCGILLIARD, M. I. 1991. Effects of scrotal insulation on viability characteristics of cryopreserved bovine semen. J. Dairy Sci., 74(11): 3827-3835. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78575-5 Go to original source...
  19. WYSOKINSKA, A., KONDRACKI, S., BANASZEWKA, D. and KONDRACKA, D. 2016. Frequency of morphological changes in spermatozoa from the boar semen of different breeds. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep., 24(Suppl. 3): 327-334.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.