Dispositional variables and work–family conflict: A meta-analysis
Research highlights
► The relationship between dispositional variables and both directions of work-family conflict was meta-analyzed. ► Negative affect, neuroticism, and self-efficacy were most highly associated with both directions of work-family conflict. ► No moderator effects were detected.
Section snippets
Theoretical support for linking work–family conflict and dispositional variables
There are several theoretical reasons to expect relationships between work–family conflict and dispositions. One is based on resource drain theory (Rothbard, 2001, Staines, 1980). Resource drain theory posits that individuals have a limited amount of resources to devote to various roles; thus, if one role requires a large amount of resources, performance in other roles will suffer. From a broad perspective, resources can be physical, psychological, or social features that aid in goal completion
Brief summary of existing research
Given the connection between work–family conflict and the stressor–strain literature, it is perhaps not surprising that negative affect and neuroticism have been the most frequently studied dispositional variables within the work–family literature. It has been proposed that negative affect impacts how individuals perceive their jobs and other life experiences and is associated with reports of stressors and strains (Spector, Zapf, Chen, & Frese, 2000). Multiple studies have shown that
Moderators
Several moderators are investigated in an exploratory manner. We focus on two groups of moderators, the dimensions of work–family conflict and demographics. The first category of moderators relates to the different forms of work–family conflict. As noted previously, there are two directions by which work–family conflict flows (work interferes with family and family interferes with work). In addition to direction, researchers also recognize multiple dimensions or types of conflict. The most
Literature search
We searched the PsycINFO database by coupling keywords for dispositions and work–family. Dispositional keywords included personality, trait, Eysenck 3 factor, Big 5 (and each dimension by different names; e.g., intellect, openness to experience, neuroticism, and emotional stability), negative affect, positive affect, Type A, locus of control, and optimism. Work–family keywords included work–family conflict, work–family balance, work–family interference, negative spillover, work–life conflict,
Results
For each meta-analytic relationship, we report the total sample size across all studies (N), the total number of independent studies associated with the reported relationship (k), and the sample-weighted correlation (rxy). We used the 95% confidence interval to determine whether effect sizes were statistically significant. Confidence intervals that did not include zero were deemed statistically significant. To assess whether or not the studies could be assumed to reflect a single population of
Discussion
The objective of the current study was to quantify the magnitude of the relationships between dispositional variables and work–family conflict. Findings suggest that dispositions are important predictors of both WIF and FIW. Our results yield key insights into the dispositional variables that serve as risk factors as well as those that appear to serve a protective function against work–family conflict. Results also suggest variation in the relationships across the different dimensions of
References (0)
Cited by (206)
To be or not to be a perfect parent? How the striving for perfect parenting harms employed parents
2023, Journal of Vocational BehaviorManaging the risks and side effects of workplace friendships: The moderating role of workplace friendship self-efficacy
2023, Journal of Vocational BehaviorTaking rivalries home: Workplace rivalry and work-to-family conflict
2023, Journal of Vocational BehaviorWORK–FAMILY ENRICHMENT: PROSPECTS FOR ENHANCING RESEARCH
2024, Research on Emotion in Organizations