Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Determination of critical low light limit and adaptive physiological and biochemical traits regulating growth and yield of mustard (Brassica juncea Coss.)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Growth and physio-biochemical traits under different incident solar light intensities (100, 67, 50 and 25%) were studied in mustard in a semi-arid agroclimate region of Central India. Our comprehensive studies revealed that incident solar light intensities below about 67% were highly detrimental in mustard for its growth and grain yield. Major factors that contributed to the differential responses under varying light intensities were identified which holds importance for better understanding of low light adaptability in an important oilseed crop like mustard. Biomass index (ratio of dry biomass to height) has been established and evaluated for the differential growth performance of the crop under different light intensities. Biomass index progressively declined from 0.48 (open sunlight) to 0.11 (25% sunlight). Physio-biochemical factors were identified that were playing major role in manifestation of the differential growth and grain yield. Mustard exhibited its low light adaptive trends through differential down-regulation in the rates of net CO2 assimilation (PN), stomatal conductance, transpiration, thylakoid electron transport rate (ETR) and leaf wax level. For example, PN decreased from 35.88 (open light) to 11.64 µmol m−2 s−1 (25% sunlight). Photochemical events showed critical impact as evidenced by decreased PSII quantum yield, photochemical quenching (qP) and higher non-photochemical quenching (qN) that were clearly associated with physiological efficiency of the plants under varying light intensities. Leaf wax level decreased from 1.69 mg g−1 fresh weight (open light) to 0.96 mg g−1 fresh weight (25% sunlight). Our results indicated that limited ETR supply across photosystem II (PSII) decreased the photochemical efficiency and carbon gain under low light which resulted in reduction of biomass index and grain yield. Besides, it was found that overexpression of protein band around ~ 26 kDa in low light could be another adaptive feature for mustard related to light harvesting complex. Our findings would augment selection of traits for optimizing growth and grain yield of mustard for low light or light limiting agro-ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Antho.:

Anthocyanin

Chl:

Chlorophyll

ETR:

Thylakoid electron transport rate

E:

Transpiration rate

Gs:

Stomatal conductance

LT:

Leaf temperature

PN :

Net CO2 assimilation rate

PPFD:

Photosynthetic photon flux density

qP:

Photochemical quenching

qN:

Non-photochemical quenching

RH:

Relative humidity

Rubisco:

Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase

ST:

Soil temperature at surface

SST:

Sub soil temperature

Ta:

Air temperature

ΦPSII :

Effective PSII quantum yield

References

  • Alam B, Nair DB, Jacob J (2005) Low temperature stress modifies the photochemical efficiency of a tropical tree species Hevea brasiliensis: effects of varying concentration of CO2 and photon flux density. Photosynthetica 43:247–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alam B, Chaturvedi M, Newaj R (2011) Impact of varying shade on CO2 assimilation, carboxylation efficiency, thylakoid electron transport and water use efficiency in Sesamum indicum L. Range Manag Agrofor 32:79–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes isolated chloroplast Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertamini M, Nedunchezhian N (2002) Leaf pigments, ribulose-1, 5 bisphosphate carboxylase, nitrate reductase and photosynthetic efficiency of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Pinot noir) grown under different light conditions. Vitis 41:169–175

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertamini M, Muthuchelian K, Nedunchezhian N (2006) Shade effect alters leaf pigments and photosynthetic responses in Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) grown under field conditions. Photosynthetica 44:227–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burkey KO, Wilson RF, Wells R (1997) Effects of canopy on the lipid composition of soybean leaves. Plant Physiol 101:591–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans JR, Poorter H (2001) Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: the relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain. Plant, Cell Environ 24:755–767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker N (1989) The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophy Acta 990:87–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hastwell GT, Facelli JM (2003) Differing effects of shade induced facilitation on growth and survival during the stablishment of a chenopod shrub. J Ecol 91:941–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kho KFE, Bolsman LAC, Vuik JC, Bennink GJH (1977) Anthocyanin synthesis in a white flowering mutant of Petunia hybrid. Plant Physiol 135:109–118

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krause GH, Weis E (1991) Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Mol Biol 42:313–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Jiang D, Wollenweber B, Dai T, Cao W (2010) Effect of shading on morphology, physiology and grain yield of winter wheat. Eur J Agron 33:267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masarovicova E, Elias P (1981) Chlorophyll content in leaves in an oak-hornbeam forest. 2. Shrub species. Photosynthetica 15:16–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Misra M (1995) Growth, photosynthetic pigment content and oil yield of Pogostemon cablin grown under sun and shade conditions. Biol Plant 37:219–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newaj R, Bhargava MK, Shanker AK, Yadav RS, Ajit Rai P (2005) Resource capture and tree crop interaction in Albizia procera based agroforestry system. Arch Agron Soil Sci 51(1):51–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn JM, Taylor TN (1990) Morphological and ultra-structural studies of plant cuticular membranes. I. Sun and shade leaves of Queracus velutina (Fagaceae). Bot Gaz 151:465–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber U, Bilger W, Hormann H, Neuberger C (1998) Chlorophyll fluorescence as a diagnostic tool: basics and some aspects of practical relevance. In: Raghavendra AS (ed) Photosynthesis: a comprehensive treatise. Cambridge University, Cambridge, pp 320–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva Fernandes AMS, Baker EA, Martin JT (1964) Studies on plant cuticle. VI. The isolation and fractionation of cuticular wax. Ann Appl Biol 53:43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Alam B (2010) Changes in the crop phenology of green gram (Vigna radiata L.) and soybean (Glycine max L. merril.) under varying regimes of shade in a semi-arid agroclimatic location. Indian J Plant Physiol 15:272–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh AK, Kumar P, Singh R, Rathore N (2012) Dynamics of tree-crop interface in relation to their influence on microclimatic changes- a review. HortFlora Res Spectr 1:193–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Valladares F, Chico J, Aranda I, Balaguer L, Dizengremel P, Manrique E, Dreyer E (2002) The greater seedling high-light tolerance of Quercus robur over Fagus sylvatica is linked to a greater physiological plasticity. Trees Struct Funct 16:395–403

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valladares F, Gianoli E, Gomez JM (2007) Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity—review. New Phytol 176:749–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kooten O, Snel JFH (1990) The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology. Photosynth Res 25:127–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang SB, Hu H, Xu K, Li ZR, Yang YP (2007) Flexible and reversible responses to different irradiance levels during photosynthetic acclimation of Cypripedium guttatum. J Plant Physiol 164:611–620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Singh BR (2004) Effect of light on anthocyanin levels in submerged, harvested cranberry fruit. Biomed Biotechnol 5:259–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All the necessary facilities for the experiments provided by the Director, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi are greatly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Badre Alam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alam, B., Singh, R., Chaturvedi, M. et al. Determination of critical low light limit and adaptive physiological and biochemical traits regulating growth and yield of mustard (Brassica juncea Coss.). Physiol Mol Biol Plants 24, 985–992 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-018-0537-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-018-0537-0

Keywords

Navigation