Skip to main content
Log in

Primates and Cameras

Noninvasive Sampling to Make Population-Level Inferences While Accounting for Imperfect Detection

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Field-based primate studies often make population inferences using count-based indices (e.g., individuals/plot) or distance sampling; the first does not account for the probability of detection and thus can be biased, while the second requires large sample sizes to obtain precise estimates, which is difficult for many primate studies. We discuss photographic sampling and occupancy modeling to correct for imperfect detection when estimating system states and dynamics at the landscape level, specifically in relation to primate ecology. We highlight the flexibility of the occupancy framework and its many applications to studying low-density primate populations or species that are difficult to detect. We discuss relevant sampling and estimation procedures with special attention to data collection via photographic sampling. To provide tangible meaning to terminology and clarify subtleties, we use illustrative examples. Photographic sampling can have many advantages over observer-based sampling, especially when studying rare or elusive species. Combining photographic sampling with an occupancy framework allows inference to larger scales than is common in primate studies, addresses uncertainty due to the observation process, and allows researchers to examine questions of how landscape-level anthropogenic changes affect primate distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abad-Franch, F., Ferraz, G., Campos, C., Palomeque, F., Grijalva, M., Aguilar, H., Miles, M. (2010). Modeling disease vector occurrence when detection is imperfect: Infestation of Amazonian palm trees by triatomine bugs at three spatial scales. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 4, e620.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ahumada, J.A., Silva, C.E.F., Gajapersad, K., Hallam, C., Hurtado, J., Martin, E. (2011). Community structure and diversity of tropical forest mammals: Data from a global camera trap network. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 4, 2703–2711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D.R. (2001). The need to get the basics right in wildlife field studies. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 29, 1294–1297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrewartha, H., & Birch, L. (1954). In The distribution and abundance of animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, L., Hines, J., Nichols, J., MacKenzie, D. (2007). Sampling design trade-offs in occupancy studies with imperfect detection: Examples and software. Ecological Applications, 17, 281–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, L., Reid, J., Forsman, E., Nichols, J. (2009). Modeling co-occurrence of northern spotted and barred owls: Accounting for detection probability differences. Biological Conservation, 142, 2983–2989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L., Arnold, T., Olubode, O., Garshelis, D. (2011). Considerations for using occupancy surveys to monitor forest primates: A case study with sclaters monkey (Cercopithecus sclateri). Population Ecology, 53, 549–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brus, D., & De Gruijter, J. (1997). Random sampling or geostatistical modelling? Choosing between design-based and model-based sampling strategies for soil (with discussion). Geoderma, 80, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, S.T., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., Laake, J.L., Borchers, D.L., Thomas, L. (2001). In Introduction to distance sampling. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, S.T., Plumptre, A.J., Thomas, L., Rexstad, E.A. (2010a). Line transect sampling of primates: Can animal-to-observer distance methods work? International Journal of Primatology, 31, 485–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, S.T., Plumptre, A.J., Thomas, L., Rexstad, E.A. (2010b). Design and analysis of line transect surveys for primates. International Journal of Primatology, 31, 833–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K.P., & Anderson, D.R. (2002). Model selection and multi-model inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer.

  • Burton, A.C., Sam, M.K., Balangtaa, C., Brashares, J.S. (2012). Hierarchical multi-species modeling of carnivore responses to hunting, habitat and prey in aWest African protected area. PloS one, 7, e38007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C.A., & Peres, C.A. (2001). Primate conservation in the new millennium: The role of scientists. Evolutionary Anthropology, 10, 16–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W.G. (1977). In Sampling techniques. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowlishaw, G., & Dunbar, R. (2000). Primate conservation biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Doherty, P.F.,White, G.C., Burnham, K.P. (2012). Comparison of model building and selection strategies. Journal of Ornithology, 152, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efford, M., & Dawson, D. (2012). Occupancy in continuous habitat. Ecosphere, 3, art32.

  • Fashing, P.J., & Cords, M. (2000). Diurnal primate densities and biomass in the Kakamega Forest: An evaluation of census methods and a comparison with other forests. American Journal of Primatology, 50, 139–152.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, I., & Chandler, R. (2011). Unmarked: An r package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. Journal of Statistical Software, 43, 123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, B., Karpanty, S., Crawford, C., Kotschwar, M., Randrianantenaina, J. (2010). An assessment of carnivore relative abundance and density in the eastern rainforests of Madagascar using remotely-triggered camera traps. Oryx, 44, 219–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, B., Karpanty, S., Randrianantenaina, J. (2012). The impact of forest logging and fragmentation on carnivore species composition, density and occupancy in madagascars rainforests. Oryx, 46, 414–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gormley, A., Forsyth, D., Griffioen, P., Lindeman, M., Ramsey, D., Scroggie, M., Woodford, L. (2011). Using presence-only and presence-absence data to estimate the current and potential distributions of established invasive species. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 2534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire, T. (1998). Design-based and model-based inference in survey sampling: Appreciating the difference. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28, 1429–1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillera-Arroita, G., Lahoz-Monfort, J.,Milner-Gulland, E., Young, R., Nicholson, E. (2010). Using occupancy as a state variable for monitoring the critically endangered Alaotran gentle lemur Hapalemur alaotrensis. Endangered Species Research, 11, 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guschanski, K., Vigilant, L., McNeilage, A., Gray, M., Kagoda, E., Robbins, M.M. (2009). Counting elusive animals: Comparing eld and genetic census of the entiremountain gorilla population of Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda. Biological Conservation, 142, 290–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, A., & Doherty, D. (2005). Species-area relationships of primates in tropical forest fragments: A global analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 630–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn, R., & Mangel, M. (1997). The ecological detective: Confronting models with data. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Hines, J.E. (2013). Presence 5.5. Software to estimate patch occupancy and related parameters. USGS-PWRC. http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/software/presence.shtml.

  • IUCN (2012). The iucn red list of threatened species. Version 20122. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 17 October 2012.

  • Karanth, K., Nichols, J., Hines, J. (2010). Occurrence and distribution of indian primates. Biological Conservation, 143, 2891–2899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kays, R., & Slauson, K. (2008). Remote cameras. In R.A. Long, P. MacKay, W.J. Zielinski, J. Ray (Eds.), Noninvasive survey methods for carnivores (pp. 110–140). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, A., Hobinjatovo, T., Razafimanahaka, H., Jenkins, R., Jones, J. (2012). The potential of occupancy modelling as a tool for monitoring wild primate populations. Animal Conservation, 15, 457–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, W., & White, G. (2009). A cautionary note on substituting spatial subunits for repeated temporal sampling in studies of site occupancy. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 1182–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucera, T., & Barrett, R. (2010). A history of camera trapping. In: A.F.O’Connell, J. D. Nichols, K. U. Karanth (Eds), Camera traps in animal ecology: Methods and analyses (pp. 9–26). New York: Springer.

  • Little, R.J. (2004). To model or not to model? Competing modes of inference for finite population sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 546–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukacs, P.M., Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R. (2010).Model selection bias and freedmans paradox. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 62, 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunn, D., Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., Best, N. (2009). The bugs project: Evolution, critique and future directions. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 3049–3067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D., & Nichols, J. (2004). Occupancy as a surrogate for abundance estimation. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 27, 461–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D., Nichols, J., Hines, J., Knutson, M., Franklin, A. (2003). Estimating site occupancy, colonization, and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly. Ecology, 84, 2200–2207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D., Nichols, J., Lachman, G., Droege, S., Royle, J.A., Langtimm, C. (2002). Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology, 83, 2248–2255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D., & Royle, J. (2005). Designing occupancy studies: General advice and allocating survey effort. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 1105–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D., Nichols, J., Royle, 674 J., Pollock, K., Bailey, L., Hines, J. (2006). Occupancy estimation and modeling: Inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence. New York: Academic Press.

  • Martins, S.S., Sanderson, J.G., e Silva-Júnior, J.S. (2007). Monitoring mammals in the Caxiuanã National Forest, Brazil-first results from the tropical ecology, assessment and monitoring (TEAM) program. Vertebrate Conservation and Biodiversity, 16, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Nichols, J., McClintock, B., Grant, E., Bailey, L., Weir, L. (2011). Improving occupancy estimation when two types of observational error occur: Non-detection and species misidentification. Ecology, 92, 1422–1428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. (1992). Capture-recapture models. BioScience, 42, 94–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J., Bailey, L., Talancy, N., Campbell, G., Gilbert, A., Annand, E. et al. (2008). Multi-scale occupancy estimation and modelling using multiple detection methods. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 1321–1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, A., Nichols, J., Karanth, K. (2010). Camera traps in animal ecology: Methods and analyses. In: New York: Springer.

  • O’Connell, A., Talancy, N., Bailey, L., Sauer, J., Cook, R., Gilbert, A. (2006). Estimating site occupancy and detection probability parameters for meso-and large mammals in a coastal ecosystem. Journal of Wildlife Management, 70, 1625–1633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, E., Marsh, R., Bovard, B., Randrianarimanana, H., Ravaloharimanitra, M., Ratsimbazafy, J., King, T. (2012). Arboreal camera trapping for the critically endangered greater bamboo lemur Prolemur simus. Oryx, 46, 593–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plumptre, A.J. (2000). Monitoring mammal populations with line transect techniques in african forests. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37, 356–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

  • Ross, C., & Reeve, N. (2003). Survey and census methods: Population distribution and density. Field and laboratory methods in primatology. In J.M. Setchell & D.J. Curtis (Eds.), Field and laboratory methods in primatology: A practical guide, (pp. 90–109). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Royle, J., & Dorazio, R. (2008). Hierarchical modeling and inference in ecology: The analysis of data from populations, metapopulations and communities. New York: Academic Press.

  • Royle, J., & Link, W. (2006). Generalized site occupancy models allowing for false positive and false negative errors. Ecology, 87, 835–841.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Royle, J.A., & Nichols, J.D. (2003). Estimating abundance from repeated presence-absence data or point counts. Ecology, 84, 777–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royle, J.A., Nichols, J.D., Kèry, M. (2005). Modelling occurrence and abundance of species when detection is imperfect. Oikos, 110, 353–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S̈arndal, C.E., Thomsen, I., Hoem, J.M., Lindley, D.V., Barndorff-Nielsen, O., Dalenius, T. (1978). Design-based and model-based inference in survey sampling [with discussion and reply]. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 5, 27–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. (2012). Sampling. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Thompson,W. (2004). Sampling rare or elusive species: Concepts, designs, and techniques for estimating population parameters. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

  • Vojta, C.D. (2005). Old dog, new tricks: Innovations with presence-absence information. Journal of Wildlife Management, 69, 845–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, G., & Burnham, K. (1999). Program mark: Survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study, 46, 120–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiewel, A.S., Adams, A.A.Y., Rodda, G.H. (2009). Evaluating abundance estimate precision and the assumptions of a count-based index for small mammals. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 73, 761–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan, X., Li, M., Zhang, Z., Goossens, B., Chen, Y., Wang, H., Bruford, M., Wei, F. (2006). Molecular censusing doubles giant panda population estimate in a key nature reserve. Current Biology, 16, R451–R452.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Marni LaFleur and Chia Tan for inviting us to contribute to this special issue. We are also grateful to Marni LaFleur, Joanna Setchell, and two anonymous reviewers for useful comments that helped improve this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian D. Gerber.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 32.2 KB)

(PDF 77.3 KB)

(PDF 33.7 KB)

(PDF 59.7 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerber, B.D., Williams, P.J. & Bailey, L.L. Primates and Cameras. Int J Primatol 35, 841–858 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-014-9761-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-014-9761-9

Keywords

Navigation